Giving up meat was more harmful to the environment than its use

Date:

2019-07-23 18:20:08

Views:

124

Rating:

1Like 0Dislike

Share:

Giving up meat was more harmful to the environment than its use

I am Going to give up meat? Not in a hurry. A new study conducted by researchers from the University Carnegie Mellon has shown that eating fruit and vegetables can cause much more harm to the environment than a meat diet. This indicator popular salad turned out to be three times more harmful than many favorite smoked pork belly.

The Study, published in the journal Environment Systems and Decisions, goes against the popular idea that giving up meat will help to stop climate change. The point is that the production of food like lettuce is associated with a higher cost of resources and harmful emissions in terms of per calorie compared to some types of meat.

See also — Artificial meat closer. Now the chicken

The implementation of the nutrition guidelines developed by the Ministry of agriculture , according to the study, turned out to be more harmful to the environment due to many factors. Despite the decrease in the number of calories consumed.

Many vegetables require a lot more resources than you think. Eggplant, celery and cucumbers look particularly bad in comparison with pork or chicken, — said the scientists.

harmful Than giving up meat

Researchers came to the conclusion that if you exclude meat from the diet and lower calorie intake to recommended by the Ministry of agriculture level, the negative impact on the environment will increase. The result will look like this: energy consumption will increase by 38 percent, water consumption by 10 percent and greenhouse gas emissions by 6 percent.

Long known that 90 percent of the heat arising from human activities is absorbed by the oceans. Most experts are concerned about the rate of temperature rise of the ocean. With a decrease the absorption ability of the ocean heat begins to accumulate in the atmosphere. This leads to the violation of thermal balance of the Earth.

Of Course, the scenario scientists surely implies a massive rejection of meat, that in modern conditions is not possible. It is interesting that the production of artificial meat will benefit the environment, scientists conducted a simulation of the reduction in consumption of natural meat, which showed that although peak emissions from livestock higher, the rates then decline and stabiliziruemost. Carbon dioxide from the production of artificial meat, in turn, is retained in the atmosphere and accumulates.

See also — the Production of artificial meat environment

In any case, the man himself has to decide what to eat, but if you limit yourself to meat products for the environment, it's not worth it. If you refuse animal products, then certainly for their own health (if needed) or due to certain beliefs. Do not forget that even eggs used to be considered a creation of the dark forces for their content of cholesterol. Then in 1995, the study showed that even if there are two eggs per day, there will be no negative consequences for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Eggs also contain many other good things, protein, vitamins, minerals, so now they are very recommended for use.

Even more interesting material you can read in our

Recommended

Social status can enter into genes

Social status can enter into genes

a Long term stay in stress because of his social status could result in the genes of primates and humans As you know, better and healthy than poor and sick. Indeed: the ones at the bottom of the social ladder, often live shorter lives than those at t...

What speed are developing the fastest ants in the world?

What speed are developing the fastest ants in the world?

Ants of the species Cataglyphis bombycina One of the fastest animals in the world since ancient times is the Cheetah in the dash can accelerate to a speed of 120 kilometers per hour. However, if we consider the speed of movement is not in the usual k...

Can science be immoral? Past experience shows that, Yes

Can science be immoral? Past experience shows that, Yes

past Experience shows that science is not always “white and fluffy” In history there are many examples that science tends often to teeter on the brink of good and evil. Someone from researchers just trying to test the new drug, and someone who adhere...

Comments (0)

This article has no comment, be the first!

Add comment

Related News

As thrown to the ground cigarette affect the environment?

As thrown to the ground cigarette affect the environment?

According to the world health organization, the number of smokers in the world has already reached the billion mark and many of them throw cigarette butts by the trash bins. However, many do not even realize that the mountain of c...

Global warming will leave without water for more than a billion people. How to save the stocks?

Global warming will leave without water for more than a billion people. How to save the stocks?

Future wars may be caused by spores, not with gold or oil, and is available now for most people a resource — water. more than half is water; from water came the first mammals in the water was born the first life; without wat...

You need to eat and drink to survive on Mars?

You need to eat and drink to survive on Mars?

most Often we don't even realize it, but our body is constantly training while walking, and even inaction. The average person usually weighs in at 70-85 pounds, and to keep this mass, different muscle groups are always in tension ...